Examinando por Autor "Cañon Valbuena, Sofia Carolina;"
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
- ÍtemSistema de responsabilidad penal para adolescentes: arquitectura institucional y alternativas para su fortalecimiento(Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores. Sede Bogotá., ) Cañon Valbuena, Sofia Carolina;; Jesús Medina, Robier DeLaw 1098 of November 8, 2006 is the regulatory framework for the guarantee of the rights of children and adolescents in Colombia. Book II contemplates a System of Adolescent Criminal Responsibility - SRPA- which, as the name implies, is designed for adolescents who are between 14 and 18 years of age who engage in conduct sanctioned by criminal law, and who although are subject to criminal responsibility In accordance with international instruments and as expressed by the Constitutional Court, 1 they deserve their own and differentiated system that responds to their quality as subjects of special constitutional protection and that is guarantor with them, with the victims of crimes and with society. 1 COLOMBIA. CONSTITUTIONAL COURT. Judgment C - 839 of 2001 and Judgment C 203 of 2005 that we will analyze later in the document. 2 GENERAL NATIONAL PROCEDURE. Surveillance Report Superior to the System of Criminal Responsibility for Adolescents of 2011, preventive action 004 of 2011. p. 17. Presented in December 2012. 3 EVALUATION COMMISSION OF THE ADOLESCENT CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY SYSTEM. Report of the Evaluation Commission of the Adolescent Criminal Responsibility System, article 110 of Law 1453 of 2011. December 23, 2011, submitted to the Congress of the Republic of Colombia on January 20, 2012. Filing number. E-2012-004490 NAC. p. 2 Since 2007, the implementation of the system began, culminating this gradual process in 2009. Before finalizing this process, and to analyze the impact of the application of the standard, a CONPES document was developed that aimed to strengthen the institutional offer and review the advances to which the SRPA had reached in those two years. This document provided important analysis and diagnostic elements, as well as resource allocation. However, it was criticized in the Report of Superior Surveillance of the System of Criminal Responsibility for Adolescents of the Office of the Attorney General of the Nation2 which manifested itself on issues such as the lack of a preventive approach to juvenile crime; the lack of commitment in terms of resources for the operation of the SRPA by all the different entities that make up the system; and the lack of a governing body that could draw policies and lines of He expressed the need to make a greater approach to what happens in the SRPA. Specifically, it highlights problems in the articulation of the entities that make up the System, lack of clarity about the role of family advocates, need for greater investment of resources, failures in the attention of adolescents that can generate rights violations, legal gaps, among others. The two reports agree that one of the biggest problems of the SRPA may be in its institutional architecture. The purpose of this research is to analyze the institutional architecture of the SRPA and its relationship with the main problems and needs of young people who engage in criminal behavior. Likewise, it is important to analyze which are the international and legal referents to which the System must obey and determine if it is complying with these normative precepts